Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Food Crisis

Click here to view this on NYTIMES.COM

Food prices are soaring to record levels, threatening many developing countries with mass hunger and political instability. Finance ministers of the Group of 20 leading economies discussed the problem at a meeting in Paris last week, but for all of their expressed concern, most are already breaking their promises to help.

After the last sharp price spike in 2008, the G-20 promised to invest $22 billion over three years to help vulnerable countries boost food production. To date, the World Bank fund that is supposed to administer this money has received less than $400 million.

Food prices are now higher than their 2008 peak, driven by rising demand in developing countries and volatile weather, including drought in Russia and Ukraine and a dry spell in North China that threatens the crop of the world’s largest wheat producer. The World Bank says the spike has pushed 44 million people into extreme poverty just since June.

In 2008, 30 countries had food riots. That has not happened, at least not yet. Sub-Saharan Africa, in particular, has benefited from improved agricultural productivity. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization warns that Mozambique, Uganda, Mali, Niger and Somalia are extremely vulnerable to instability because of rising prices, along with Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan in Asia, and Haiti, Guatemala, Bolivia and Honduras in Latin America.

Misguided government policies could make matters worse. Some countries are stockpiling food. When India did that last year, food ended up rotting in storages. Others are imposing agricultural export bans, which discourages investment in production. The world’s wealthier nations must press them to rethink these polices and back that up with real help.

The Obama administration has proposed worthy initiatives, but even when Democrats controlled Congress it had a hard time getting the money. The administration pledged $3.5 billion to the G-20 effort. So far, it has delivered only $66.6 million to the World Bank fund.

It is now asking for $408 million for the fund — part of a $1.64 billion request for its Feed the Future initiative, which aims to bolster poor countries’ food production capabilities. Congressional Republicans are determined to hack as much as they can out of foreign aid. The continuing resolution passed by the House cuts $800 million out of the food aid budget — bringing it down to about $1 billion, roughly where it was in 2001.

The White House needs to push back hard. This isn’t a question of charity. It is an issue of life or death for millions of people. And the hard truth is that if the United States doesn’t keep its word, no one else will.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund


The Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF) is a pooled funding mechanism established in 2005 for humanitarian activities in Sudan. Under the overall authority of the Humanitarian Coordinator (HC), the Sudan CHF is intended to give the HC greater ability to target funds to the most critical humanitarian needs, encourage early donor contributions and enable a rapid response to unforeseen circumstances. A similar mechanism exists in the Democratic Republic of Congo (See the DRC Pooled Fund's Overview).

Only humanitarian projects included in the UN and Partners Work Plan for Sudan (the Work Plan) are eligible for CHF funding. The Work Plan outlines the annual strategic and operational plan for the UN and partners' assistance in Sudan and is developed in consultation with national, regional and local authorities. It is divided into seven planning regions and one national programme, each covering up to twelve sectors with four cross cutting issues that all sectors are expected to integrate into their programming.In 2010, 143 UN and Partner Agencies participated in the 2010 Work Plan which includes 410 projects requiring a total of US$1.9 billion to conduct critical humanitarian and early recovery activities for the year.

Both the Work Plan and the Sudan CHF help advance humanitarian aid reforms as proposed in the Secretary-General's report, In Larger Freedom (2005), such as strengthened response capacity, more predictable and timely funding to organizations, strengthened coordination, as well as donors' endorsement of Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) principles.

This website is not the official Sudan CHF website, but the UNDP Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office information website on the Sudan CHF. To visit the official Sudan CHF website, click here.

The Sudan CHF is administered by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office (MDTF Office) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in accordance with its financial regulations and rules.

EXPLANATORY NOTE! As contributions of several donors are received at the end of the calendar year to ensure predictability of funding ahead of the Humanitarian Planning Exercise for the following year, please note that generally October through December contributions are available for programming in the following year. For some donors this end year contributions may also constitute contributions of the following year.

The objectives of the Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF) is to support the timely allocation and disbursement of donor resources to the most critical humanitarian needs under the overall oversight and coordination of the Humanitarian Coordinator. It is only used for projects classified as "humanitarian" under the Work Plan.

The Sudan CHF is intended to improve humanitarian outcomes by providing committed funds earlier than under previous arrangements; strengthening the planning and coordination process; tying the funding allocation to the Work Plan; broadening participation in the Work Plan; channelling funds towards the most urgent needs; and by ensuring that funds are available for rapid responses to unforeseen circumstances. To achieve these objectives, the CHF has been designed to accommodate the following principles:

  • The CHF should operate as a single fund;
  • Donors should make commitments and transfer money to the CHF as early as possible;
  • The CHF should use the Work Plan as its primary allocation tool;
  • Allocation and disbursement procedures should be rapid and transparent;
  • There should be no overall additional reporting burden on recipients;
  • The CHF should maintain a reserve for rapid response to unforeseen circumstances;
  • The operation of The CHF should meet acceptable fiduciary standards.

The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the allocation of funds based on priority needs and absorptive capacities. In allocating funding, the Humanitarian Coordinator may request advice from the Advisory Group, comprising representatives of donors, the UN, NGOs and others as deemed necessary. The Advisory Group will ensure that the activities funded under the Sudan CHF are harmonized with those funded bilaterally by the donors. The Humanitarian Coordinator is also supported by the Administrative Agent (AA), a Technical Support Unit, and a Monitoring and Evaluation Unit.

There are two mechanisms for allocating funds:

  • A standard allocation mechanism, used for allocating the bulk of the Sudan CHF resources and ensuring early funding for priority projects.
  • A rapid onset mechanism, used in the event of unforeseen needs or emergency circumstances. No more than 10% of committed funds is kept aside for the Rapid Response Reserve.

To support uniform and consolidated financial reporting, the Sudan CHF is administered by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in accordance with its financial regulations and rules. UNDP serves as the Administrative Agent (AA) on behalf of the Participating UN Organizations. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) serves as the CHF technical unit and is responsible for managing the allocation process in Sudan. For participating NGOs, funds are channelled through UNDP performing an additional oversight function as a Participating UN Organization.

Humanitarian Coordinator
The overall management of the Sudan CHF activities will be led and coordinated by the Humanitarian Coordinator (HC). According to the Sudan CHF Terms of Reference, the HC is responsible for:

  • Mobilizing resources;
  • Defining the level of the Rapid Response Reserve and allocating CHF resources according to agreed procedures;
  • Allocating in particular Sudan CHF resources to IOM and NGO partners involved in the Work Plan through UNDP, in line with the allocation process and in keeping with UNDP's regulations and rules;
  • Approving allocations and disbursements;
  • Reporting to donors in accordance with Work Plan requirements and the Sudan CHF Terms of Reference;
  • Managing the process of monitoring and evaluation the impact and effectiveness of Work Plan delivery;
  • Chairing the Advisory Group.

In his/her role the HC is supported by a Technical Support Unit, a Monitoring and Evaluation Unit and the Administrative Agent.

Advisory Group
The Sudan CHF Advisory Group has been formed to represent the views of the Donors, the UN Country Team (UNCT) and the NGO community. The Advisory Group consist of the HC (as Chair); local representatives of the three largest donors to the Sudan CHF; UN Country Team representatives, including the Participating UN Organizations; and one representative of the NGO community. The Chair can invite additional donors, UNCT, NGO members and any other person deemed necessary for improving discussion and recommendations by the Advisory Group.

The Advisory Board is responsible for:

  • If requested by the HC, advising him/her on the most appropriate allocation of resources, based on needs, priorities, and absorptive capacities;
  • Reviewing policy guidelines and regional and project allocation made by the HC at various points in the consultative Work Plan;
  • Reviewing the reports submitted by the Administrative Agent and the HC;
  • Reviewing the operational activities of the CHF itself, especially at the middle and end of the Work Plan cycle;
  • Ensuring that the activities funded under the CHF are harmonized with those funded bilaterally by the Donors;
  • Advising on any issue related to the operations of the CHF.

Administrative Agent
The UNDP serves as the Administrative Agent (AA) and is responsible for concluding Standard Administrative Arrangement(SAA) with donors and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Participating UN Organizations. It receives, administers and manages contributions from Donors. It disburses these funds to the Participating UN Organizations in accordance with the decisions of the HC. The AA also maintains a Rapid Response Reserve as directed by the HC. Finally, the AA prepares and submits financial reports on the Sudan CHF account to the HC, each donor that has contributed to the CHF, as well as the Advisory Group.

CHF Technical Unit
The Humanitarian Coordinator is supported by a CHF Technical Unit managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). This unit is responsible for programmatic aspects associated with the management of the Sudan CHF, including the facilitation of the CHF allocation process.

CHF TOR - Terms of Reference

Elegibility
Only humanitarian projects falling within the framework of the UN and Partners Work Plan for Sudan (the Work Plan) are eligible for Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF) funding.

Proposal Submission
The Humanitarian Coordinator (HC) issues allocation policy paper to steer the allocation process, based on available humanitarian information, as well as humanitarian needs. Participating UN Organizations, Non-UN Participating Organizations such as the International Organization for Migration (IOM), Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and their partners are requested to submit developed project proposals for projects selected for Sudan CHF funding.

Proposal Review & Approval Process

The primary project technical review function is done through the Work Plan planning process.

Since February 2010, the HC has adopted a revised CHF standard allocation model to provide more transparency, guidance and accountability in the selection process by introducing two regional envelopes (north and south) and specifying the selection criteria. The revised model also aims to shorten the period between the project review and final allocation.

Once the HC issues the allocation policy paper, consultations occur within sector coordination groups to recommend sector priorities for Sudan CHF allocations, in line with the priorities outlined in the Work Plan. A list of priority projects is then endorsed by each sector group and submitted to the HC for approval. Under exceptional circumstances, the HC may exclude certain projects and add others in order to further the objectives of the overall humanitarian programme and achieve an improved balance.

The HC then informs the recipient organizations of the allocation decision. S/he instructs the Administrative Agent (AA) of the CHF to transfer funds to the relevant organizations. Disbursements to Participating UN Organizations and Non-UN Participating Organizations such as IOM are made within three (3) to five (5) business days of receipt of the appropriate documentation signed by both the HC and the Participating UN Organization and the Non-UN Participating Organizations, depending on the availability of donor funds.

Disbursements to NGOs involved in the Work Plan are made through UNDP performing an additional oversight function as a Participating UN Organization (see CHF TOR).

This tab shows only recent documents relevant at the Fund level. To see more documents at both the fund and project level go to the Document Center.

8 documents found.
Document dateDocument typeDocument
1 Jan 2010Other2010 Sudan Workplan.pdf
31 Dec 2009Annual Progress ReportSudan-CHF Certified Financial Statement 2009 - ...
31 Dec 2008OtherSudan CHF-Certified Financial Statement 2008.pdf
25 Nov 2008MoUSudan CHF - MOU_FINAL_251108.doc
25 Nov 2008SAASudan CHF -SAA_FINAL 251108.doc
31 Jul 2008Framework Doc/TORSudan CHF Terms of Reference.pdf
31 Dec 2007OtherSudan CHF-Certified Financial Statement 2007-We...
31 Dec 2006OtherSudan CHF-Certified Financial Statemen

UN Civil Society Trust Fund

The UN’s current policy towards civil society stems from the Millennium Declaration of 2000, which includes the commitment by member states to develop strong partnerships with civil society organisations (CSOs) in pursuit of development and poverty eradication. The commitments of the Millennium Declaration were reinforced by the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document. Against this background the UN Secretary General appointed a Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations in 2003. The Cardoso Report was presented in 2004 under the title “We the peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and global governance”. The report contained far-reaching recommendations to strengthen civil society around the world and to strengthen the UN System’s ability to interact with civil society.

As follow-up to the Secretary General’s response, the United Nations Development Group Working Group on Civil Society have developed a Framework for Action for Enhancing Engagement with Civil Society to be funded by a United Nations civil society trust fund. The framework for action and the proposed UN Civil Society Fund (UNCSF) aim at: i) promoting an enabling environment for civil society and public participation; ii) strengthening the capacity of civil society organizations as well as their organizational and institutional capacity; iii) enabling civil society participation in policy development; and iv) ensuring effective involvement of civil society in the work of the United Nations.

A pilot phase, spanning the three year period 2009-2011, will provide grants to 20 selected countries to field test approaches to strengthening UN-civil society relations. An independent evaluation will be undertaken after two years and the findings will be used to develop a second phase of the Fund.

The UN Civil Society Fund is administered by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office (MDTF Office) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in accordance with its financial regulations and rules.

The purpose of the proposed UN Civil Society Fund is to strengthen a process of collaboration between the UN and civil society at the country level from a vantage point of partners. This Fund is designed to help realise this potential by:

• Promoting the existence of an enabling environment, including support to the establishment of regulatory frameworks for CSOs.

• Supporting the civil society sector to establish their own collaborative frameworks, such as national platforms, federations and/or other apex institutions.

• Capacity-development support to civil society structures, especially apex institutions, to facilitate their management capability, good governance, public accountability and transparency.

• Develop UN’s capacity for partnerships with civil society. The UNCSF will provide the UN System at the country level with the resources necessary to work systematically with civil society. Such efforts will be complemented by a consultative mechanism, which ensures that the UN Country Team (UNCT), composed of Participating UN Organizations, has access to the best national advice on civil society issues. A National Civil Society Consultative Group (NCSCG) will therefore complement the capacity of the UNCTs.

Eligibility

The Participating UN Organizations at the country level will be eligible to submit a proposal - either a Joint Programme jointly developed by Participating UN Organizations or a project to be implemented by a single Participating UN Organization to the UN Civil Society Steering Committee (UNCSSC); on either occasion, proposals are to have been developed by the Participating UN Organization in consultation with the civil society beneficiary organizations/partners. Depending on the funds available, 20 countries will be invited to submit programme proposals for this pilot phase. During the first phase, one Proposal per country will be approved.

Participating UN Organizations that have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Administrative Agent will be eligible to receive funding from the UNCSF based on the approved Proposals. Governments and civil society organizations can receive funding through Participating UN Organizations playing oversight functions, and in accordance to the appropriate implementing arrangements and partnership mechanisms.

Selection Criteria

The overall approach of the Fund will be to elicit proposals from the country level, for which grant funding will be provided, to be endorsed by the UN Resident Coordinator and by the country level National Civil Society Consultative Group (NCSCG) which will be established in each participating country. There will be no funding for regional or global initiatives. The Fund is not intended to support UN activities in isolation from civil society, nor vice versa, since strengthened partnerships is the overall objective. Such collaboration will also include national authorities, in keeping with national ownership of development processes.

The selection of proposals will be guided by a combination of the following criteria:

- UN Country Teams that have appointed a UN civil society focal point.

- UN Country Teams that operate in countries where an enabling environment for civil society needs to be developed and/or strengthened.

- UN Country Teams that operate in countries in crisis, post-conflict or transition.

UN Civil Society Fund (UNCSF) Organizational Chart

  • UN Civil Society Advisory Board (UNCSAB)

The UNCSAB will provide advice and guidance to the UNCSF and monitor its performance to ensure consistency with its intended purpose. Members of the UNCSAB will comprise two representatives of Civil Society Organisations, two representatives of contributors to the Fund, i.e. member states, private foundations, private sector entities, the Office of the President of the General Assembly and the Chair of the UNCSSC.

  • UN Civil Society Inter-Agency Steering Committee (UNCSSC)

The UNCSSC will be tasked with articulating the strategic priorities of the Fund, decide on resource allocations and programme implementation issues. The UNCSSC will comprise of representatives of Participating UN Organizations, UN Fund for International Partnerships (UNFIP), one representative of contributors (who is also a member of UNCSAB) and one representative of CSOs (who is also a member of UNCSAB)

  • UNCSSC Secretariat

The secretariat function will be undertaken on a rotational basis for at least 2 consecutive years by one of the Participating UN Organizations. The UNDP Civil Society Organizations Division at the Partnerships Bureau, will serve the first term as the UNCSSC Secretariat.

  • UN Resident Coordinators and Participating UN Organizations

At the country level, the UN Resident Coordinator will be responsible for the overall guidance and coordination of the Proposal funded by the UNCSF. The Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) Office of UNDP shall serve as the Administrative Agent of the UNCSF. Projects will be implemented by Participating UN Organizations. Each Participating UN Organization will assume full programmatic and financial accountability for the funds disbursed to it by the Administrative Agent.

The UN Resident Coordinator will establish a National Civil Society Consultative Group (NCSCG) to guide implementation and use of the UNCSF resources at the country level. The establishment and proper functioning of this body will be a requirement for developing a proposal funded by the Fund in any given country. The NCSCG will be co-chaired by the Resident Coordinator and the Civil Society Representative duly appointed. Membership of the NCSCG may vary according to specific country circumstances but will always comprise representatives of civil society organisations in partnership with UN Organizations, representatives of national authorities and participating UN Organizations’ representatives. The functions of the NCSCG will be twofold: to promote and oversee UNCSF activities at the country level, encompassing all activities that serve to promote improved partnership between the UN development agencies and civil society; to oversee the allocation of the UNCSF resources in support of the above, including the review of proposals as well as oversight of implementation of all activities undertaken under the UNCSF and to endorse proposals before they are submitted to the UNCSSC for review and approval.

The Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) Office of UNDP shall serve as theAdministrative Agent of the UNCSF. UNDP’s accountability as the Administrative Agent is set out in the policy “UNDP’s Accountability when acting as Administrative Agent in MDTFs and /or UN Joint Programmes using the pass-through fund management modality.” (See link: http://www.undp.org/mdtf/docs/UNDP-AA-guidelines.pdf). The UNIPP Terms of Reference defines a collaborative framework for coordinated and joint interventions among the participating UN Organizations, indigenous peoples, governments and other partners.

Roles and Responsibilities

UN Civil Society Inter-Agency Steering Committee (UNCSSC)

•Set strategic priorities of the UNCSF, allocate resources and provide guidance on programme implementation issues.

•Review all Concept Notes and select those that will be included in the first round (the first 20 proposals).

•Review Proposals and make a decision on their funding.

UNCSSC Secretariat

•Review proposals submitted by Participating UN Organizations for completeness and consistency with the Framework for Action for Enhancing Engagement with Civil Society and transmit to the UNCSSC for review.

•Transmit proposals approved by the UNCSSC to the Administrative Agent for fund disbursement.

•Synthesize and compile the narrative reports submitted by Participating UN Organizations.

•Prepare agenda background documentation and summary minutes for the UNCSSC meetings.

Administrative Agent

As Administrative Agent, the UNDP MDTF Office will administer resources under the direction of the UNCSSC and will be responsible for the following activities:

•Sign an MOU with the Participating UN Organizations.

•Negotiate and sign Standard Administrative Arrangements with donors that wish to provide contributions to the UNCSF.

•Receive, administer and manage contributions from donors.

•Disburse funds to Participating UN Organizations based on resource allocation decisions of the UNCSSC.

•Consolidate financial reports from Participating UN Organizations and submit them to the UNCSF Secretariat for inclusion in the annual Progress Report.

•Transmit UNCSF’s annual Progress Report to donors following the endorsement of the UNCSSC.

Participating UN Organization(s):

•Share concept notes and Proposals with the UNCTs for further submission to the UNCSF Secretariat for consideration by the UNCSSC.

•In collaboration with the relevant/concerned CSOs, design, implement and oversee projects financed by the UNCSF.

•Establish a separate ledger account for the receipt and administration of the funds disbursed to it by the Administrative Agent.

Concept Notes

The UNCSSC, with the support of the Administrative Agent and UNCSSC Secretariat, will develop terms of reference for two-page Concept Notes for a Proposal, the detailed criteria that will be applied in reviewing the concept notes, and a standard concept note form that all Participating UN Organizations will be required to use when submitting requests to the UNCSF. An invitation for Joint Programmes/project proposals will be issued by the Chair of the UNCSSC, addressed to all UN Resident Coordinators. It will specify that all submissions must be endorsed by the National Civil Society Consultative Group. The deadline for response will be two months from the date of issuance of the invitation.

Concept notes for funding under the UNCSF will originate from the UN Resident Coordinator and will require the endorsement of the National Civil Society Consultative Group (NCSCG). Concept notes will be submitted to the UNCSF Secretariat for initial screening and to UNCSSC for selection and approval. The UNCSSC will hold a meeting at which it will select the Concept Notes.

Joint Programme/Project Proposals

The selected Concept Notes will be developed into Joint Programme or projects proposals, which will be submitted to the UNCSSC Secretariat for further approval by UNCSSC.

The UNCSSC Secretariat will review the Proposals to ensure that all the required information is included in the standard request form before submission to the UNCSAB. The UNCSSC Secretariat will prepare the portfolio of Proposals within a maximum of one week upon their receipt. The Proposals will be circulated to UNCSSC members at least three weeks in advance of the UNCSSC meeting, where budget allocation decisions are to be made. The UNCSSC will hold a meeting at which it will review the Proposals and make a decision of accepting it, requesting further review or rejecting it.

This tab shows only recent documents relevant at the Fund level. To see more documents at both the fund and project level go to theDocument Center.

4 documents found.
Document dateDocument typeDocument
20 Oct 2010SAASAA- Civil Society Trust Fund.pdf
18 Feb 2010OtherUNCSF Organizational Chart.pdf
18 Feb 2010MoUMOU - Civil Society Trust Fund.pdf
26 Feb 2009Framework Doc/TORTOR Civil Society Trust Fund.pdf

UNDG Haiti Reconstruction Fund

UNDG HRF Terms of Reference HRF Framework Document Haiti Aid Assistance Portal

The United Nations Development Group Haiti Reconstruction Fund (UNDG HRF) is an integral part of the Haiti Reconstruction Fund (HRF) established by the Government of Haiti (GoH) as a Financial Intermediary Fund to finance priority projects and Programmes under the GoH’s Action Plan for National Recovery and Development of Haiti (“Recovery Plan”) dated March 2010. Donors will support the HRF by making contributions through the International Development Association (IDA) that has been selected by the GoH to serve as a Trustee to the HRF (Fiscal Agent). Upon instruction from the HRF Steering Committe, the Fiscal Agent will transfer approved funding to the HRF Partner Entities – the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) through its Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office (MDTF Office) acting as the Administrative Agent on behalf of the Participating UN Organizations, and the IDA – that will administer and manage their separate trust funds in accordance with their respective policies and procedures to finance priority programmes as approved by the HRF Steering Committee.

The key guiding principles of the UNDG HRF include:

  • Government leadership – the governance structure and the process for approving grants will be led by the GoH;
  • Consistency with Aid Effectiveness Agenda of national ownership and alignment with the GoH Recovery Plan;
  • Increased coordination and harmonization and focus on results;
  • Speed and flexibility in delivering results;
  • Transparency and accountability in the utilization of the HRF’s resources;
  • Focus on building the capacities of GoH and other national institutions aimed at developing sustainable local capacities for the long term.

Priority projects and programmes of the UNDG HRF will be implemented by UN Organizations, in collaboration with government entities, international and national Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), in accordance with the applicable implementation arrangement of the UN Organizations

UNDG HRF Terms of Reference; HRF Framework Document; Haiti Aid Assistance Portal

Following the devastating earthquake of 12 January 2010, the Government of Haiti (GoH) prepared an Action Plan for National Recovery and Development (“Recovery Plan”) dated March 2010, which articulates the vision of the GoH and its priorities for recovery, reconstruction and development based on the GoH led Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA). The PDNA was carried out with support from the European Commission (EC), the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), the United Nations (UN), and the World Bank (WB).

As a component of the Haiti Reconstruction Fund (HRF), the United Nations Development Group Haiti Reconstruction Fund (UNDG HRF) will allow the UN system to provide a coordinated and coherent support to the GoH in the implementation of its Recovery Plan. The funded programs will complement other recovery, reconstruction and development activities supported by the development partners of the GoH.

The UNDG HRF will finance programmes in the following priority areas also outlined in the Recovery Plan that will be endorsed by theUNDG HRF Management Committee and approved by the HRF Steering Committee:

  • Territorial Rebuilding
    • Reconstruction of devastated zones
    • National transport network
    • Preparation for the hurricane season and disaster risk management
    • National planning and local development
    • Watershed management
  • Economic Rebuilding
    • Agricultural production
    • Investment and access to credit
    • Private sector
    • Access to electricity
    • The role of the Haitian Diaspora
  • Social Rebuilding
    • Housing for the population: temporary and permanent
    • Creation of high-intensity labour jobs
    • Social protection
    • Education: Returning to school and school construction
    • Healthcare, food security and nutrition, water and sanitation
  • Institutional Rebuilding
    • Democratic institutions
    • Relaunching central administrations: salaries, relocation, equipment
    • Justice and security

The UNDG HRF will be administered by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office (MDTF Office) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), in accordance with its financial regulations and rules, acting as one of the Partner Entities of the HRF, on behalf of the UN Organizations.

UNDG HRF Terms of Reference; HRF Framework Document;Memorandum of Understanding; Transfer Agreement

HRF Steering Committee

Under the chairmanship of the Government of Haiti (GoH), the Haiti Reconstruction Fund (HRF) Steering Committee is responsible for the overall management of the HRF. It comprises GoH representatives, key donor partners making the minimum contribution to the HRF of USD 30 million, representatives of the HRF Partner Entities - theInter-American Development Bank (IADB), the United Nations, and the International Development Association – and a representative of the Trustee as an ex-officio member. Other observing participants would include International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGO) representatives, the private sector, local governments and other development partners as agreed by the Steering Committee. The UN Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General/ Resident Coordinator (DSRSG/RC) will represent the UNDG Organizations in the HRF Steering Committee. The Steering Committee is responsible for:

  • Providing oversight and serving as the final point of accountability for the use of HRF resources;
  • Approving the HRF strategy and key policies and providing strategic guidance;
  • Approving or endorsing specific HRF programmes or projects and funding allocations proposed by the HRF Partner Entities or designating the HRF Partner Entities that will be responsible for administering specific HRF activities;
  • Reviewing overall progress of HRF operations including periodic progress and financial reports of the HRF Partner Entities;
  • Deciding to withhold disbursements in the Transfer Agreementsdue to (a) a substantial deviation from approved work plans and budgets; (b) failure of the Partner Entity to provide reports on time; or (c) evidence of financial mismanagement in Projects;
  • Ensuring coherence and synergy between the activities of the HRF Partner Entities.

HRF Secretariat

The HRF Secretariat, based in Port-au-Prince, will support the HRF Steering Committee in the daily operations of the HRF. The functions of the Secretariat will include receiving proposals for review by the HRF Steering Committee, organizing meetings, drafting and minutes, providing public information, and offering guidance to partner agencies on the processes and requirements as laid out by the HRF Steering Committee.

HRF Trustee/ Fiscal Agent

IDA will serve as the Fiscal Agent for the HRF and is responsible for:

  • Establish the Fund to receive contributions from HRF donors;
  • Administer the funds, assets and receipts that constitute the HRF;
  • Make transfers to the HRF Partner Entities, in accordance with the decisions of the HRF Steering Committee;
  • Provide regular reports to the HRF Steering Committee on the financial status of the Fund.

HRF Partner Entities

The HRF Partner Entities consists of IADB, UNDP and IDA, and any other multilateral development bank as agreed by the HRF Steering Committee. Each HRF Partner Entity is responsible for the use of funds transferred by the HRF Fiscal Agent and activities carried out with the financing in accordance with (a) its own financial regulations, rules, policies, guidelines, and procedures, and (b) the applicable decisions of the HRF Steering Committee, including the purpose for which the allocations of the funds have been approved.

UNDG HRF Management Committee
The UNDG HRF Management Committee which will be chaired by the DSRSG/RC and comprises of heads of UNDG HRF Participating UN Organizations, will be responsible for:

  • Reviewing and endorsing programme proposals and funding requests submitted by Participating UN Organizations that have been vetted by Programme Groups;
  • Ensuring conformity of UN operations with GoH’s Action Plan for National Recovery and Development of Haiti (“Recovery Plan”) and priorities set by the HRF Steering Committee;
  • Confirming UN proposals have been requested by the relevant GoH counterpart Ministries or institutions;
  • Reviewing funding requirements of UN programmes and submitting to the HRF Steering Committee fund allocation requests of the UNDG HRF;
  • Ensuring UN wide consistency and quality control of programmes submitted for funding to the HRF Steering Committee;
  • Reviewing UN programme/project management, monitoring and evaluation, impact assessment, and implementation modalities.
  • Ensuring coordination and avoiding overlap of UNDG HRF activities with programmes of the HRF Partner Entities and other HRF stakeholders;
  • Reviewing and approving the UNDG HRF consolidated annual and other progress reports submitted by the Administrative Agent (AA).

Programme Groups

The Programme Groups are responsible for reviewing the respective UN programme proposals prior to their submission to the UNDG HRF Management Committee for endorsement and onward submission to the HRF Steering Committee. The Programme Groups ensure programmes’ alignment with the GoH Recovery Plan and the reconstruction priorities identified by the HRF Steering Committee. They vet the technical quality of the proposals and review compliance with established criteria.

Administrative Agent

The UNDP Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office (MDTF Office) serves as the AA for the UNDG HRF and is responsible for concluding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Participating UN Organizations and receiving, through the HRF Fiscal Agent, allocations from the HRF to the UNDG HRF for utilization by the UNDG HRF Participating Organizations. The AA also prepares and submits consolidated progress reports on the UNDG HRF.

Eligibility

Participating Organizations will sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Multi-Donor Trust Fund Office (MDTF Office) as theirAdministrative Agent (AA), setting out their respective roles, responsibilities and accountabilities. Participating UN Organizations that sign the MOU will be eligible to receive funds from the UNDG Haiti Reconstruction Fund (UNDG HRF) Account following endorsement by the UNDG HRF Management Committee and final approval by the HRF Steering Committee.

Proposal Submission:

In accordance with guidelines and procedures issued by the UNDG HRF Management Committe, Participating UN Organizations will work together in Programme Groups to develop and submit programme proposals/concept notes through the UN Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General/ Resident Coordinator (DSRSG/RC) for UNDG HRF Management Committee endorsement. Such programme proposals/concept notes should be based on a requests from Government counterpart Ministries or institutions, for Participating UN Organizations to develop concrete programmes to meet specific needs. Following the UNDG HRF Management Committee review and endorsement, the DSRSG/RC will submit the programme proposals/concept notes, through the HRF Secretariat, to the HRF Steering Committee for approval.

Proposal Review & Approval Process

The HRF Secretariat will first ensure that the programme proposals/concept notes meet the criteria established by the HRF Steering Committee for receipt of funding from the HRF. The programme proposals/concept notes are then submitted to the HRF Steering Committee for approval. Upon approval, the latter will allocate resources to UNDG HRF, through the HRF Fiscal Agent. Subsequently, the UNDG HRF Management Committee will ensure that project/programme documents, with budgets, are fully developed. After ensuring the project /programme document meets the approval conditions of the HRF Steering Committee, the DSRSG/RC will request the AA to transfer the approved funds to the Participating UN Organizations in line with the HRF Steering Committee's funding instructions. The AA will make disbursements within three (3) to five (5) business days after receipt of the instruction along with the required documentation.

This tab shows only recent documents relevant at the Fund level. To see more documents at both the fund and project level go to theDocument Center.

5 documents found.
Document dateDocument typeDocument
30 Nov 2010OtherTransfer Agreement Haiti Reconstruction Fund (H...
22 Oct 2010MoUFinal_UNDG_HRF_MOU_22Oct2010.pdf
26 May 2010MoUMOU-IOM.pdf
11 May 2010OtherHRF Framework Document final DRAFT May 11.pdf
29 Apr 2010Framework Doc/TORFinal UNDG HRF TOR _29 April 2010.pdf