Monday, November 28, 2011

Reuters: Al Shabaab rebels ban some aid groups in Somalia

(Reuters) - Al Shabaab rebels banned some U.N. and international aid agencies from working in Somalia on Monday and began seizing and looting some of their offices in southern and central areas of the country, the Islamist group and aid sources said.

The move comes as aid groups battle to stem a famine that has left a quarter of a million Somalis in danger of starvation and Kenyan, Somali and Ethiopian forces fight the al-Qaeda-inspired rebels in the south and center of the country.

Al-Shabaab, which controls large areas of the anarchic Horn of Africa country, said it had "decided to permanently revoke the permissions of the following organizations to operate inside Somalia."...

Click here for full story on REUTERS

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Kenya: Smart Logistics – how a female trader helps smallholders



Rose Mutuku talking to farmers in Kitui, eastern Kenya.

Copyright: WFP.

In 2006, Rose Mutuku quit her job at a local brewery to set up Smart Logistics Solution Ltd. What sets Smart Logistics apart from many other traders is that its business model is built around creating partnerships with smallholder farmers. Rose has a passion for rural development because she became tired of seeing farmers in poverty despite all their hard work, she says.

In the beginning, Rose’s small-scale business mainly bought sorghum from farmers and then sold it to a brewery. Over time, she found more buyers and diversified the commodities that Smart Logistics deals with. Currently, the company trades in maize, cowpeas, soya beans, chili and passion fruits.
In addition to 11 permanent employees, 17 mobilizers work for the company in various locations in Kenya’s Eastern Province. The mobilizers are paid on commission basis based on the volume of commodities they buy from smallholders.

Storage

Through a grant from the Market Linkages Initiative (MLI), Smart Logistics has managed to build seven village aggregation centers (VAC) each with a capacity of 200 tons. The aggregation centers will be used by smallholders to bulk their produce and shall be managed by village committees. Each village aggregation center is equipped with a moisture meter, pallets and weighing machines. Three out of the seven centers also have stitching machines, collapsible drier bags and sieves. Smart Logistics has also constructed a grain bulking center with a capacity of 10,000 tons, and plans to establish a laboratory within the center for quality testing

Marketing

In 2010, 3,000 farmers from 135 farmer organizations sold their sorghum to Smart Logistics. To ensure quality, the company sensitizes farmers on quality issues together with the Ministry of Agriculture and other partners. Smart Logistics sells all commodities bought from farmers as soon as they are aggregated. The company currently has four major buyers namely East Africa Breweries for sorghum, Promasidor and Bidco for soya beans and WFP for sorghum, beans and maize.

Smart Logistics secures long term contracts over two to five years with its buyers. Based on these contracts, it enters into an agreement with organized farmers to produce the required commodities. The hired mobilizers discuss the price to be proposed to buyers together with the farmers: they project what it will take the farmers to produce and prepare the commodity for the market, add profit for the farmer, then add 1.50 Shillings per kg for Smart Logistics’ profit.

Smart Logistics therefore makes its profit on volumes - and this is why long term contracts with buyers are so important to Rose, as they allow her company to plan ahead. Another unique feature of Smart Logistics is that unlike other traders, Rose’s earnings are based on commission rather than on market speculation.

Selling to WFP

Rose had four contracts with WFP over the last 2 years. The first contract was awarded through an open tender in 2010, and she supplied 53 tons of sorghum. In 2011, the company received three forward delivery contracts of 112, 56 and 51 tons of maize, sorghum and beans. Delivery for these contracts is expected to be completed by the end of the year. Using the contracts, Rose has secured credit from input suppliers (inputs are provided to farmers and recovered from the sales) as well as from banks: In 2011, the company managed to secure a bank loan of three million Kenya shillings (US$32,000).

Challenges

Smart Logistics faces a number of challenges. At the moment, the biggest is the drought in many parts of Kenya, as many farmers were unable to produce enough food to sell. Price volatility also negatively affected the company’s ability to supply maize and beans. In the future, the company plans to be a regional provider of raw materials to manufacturers and start with value addition of commodities through primary manufacturing – another key step to connect farmers to markets in Kenya.

Turtle Bay:Hillary Clinton tells UN's Ban: I want Ertharin Cousin to head World Food Program. No US support for Sheeran


US STATE DEPARTMENT WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FOR JOSETTE SHEERAN

CLICK HERE FOR CLINTON LETTER ON COUSIN (or full story on FOREIGNPOLICY.COM)




U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stepped up a U.S. campaign to persuade the United Nations to appoint Ertharin Cousin, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Agencies for Food and Agriculture, to the top job at the World Food Program. But WFP's current leader, Josette Sheeran, is continuing to make her own case to donors and the U.N. leadership that she should lead the organization for a second five-year term, according to U.N. officials.

In a confidential Nov. 18 letter to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Clinton said she was writing "to nominate" Cousin as the U.S. candidate to be the next Executive Director of the World Food Program. "The United States believes Ambassador Cousin is eminently qualified to lead the World Food Program as it confronts challenges both old and new.... She would bring new energy to the organization's work," Clinton wrote.

Cousin, formerly president of the Polk Street Group, a Chicago-based public relations firm, has served in various corporate and non-profit jobs, including a stint at Albertsons, the food giant, and served as chief operating officer for America's Second Harvest, a national anti-hunger organization. Turtle Bay first reported earlier this month that the Obama administration wanted the job to go to Cousin.

The United States has long been the largest contributor to WFP, providing more than 40 percent of its budget in cash and surplus food supplies. The program has been a favorite of the U.S. food industry, which has benefited from a stable market of international crises. It has been politically popular in Washington because it helps project an image of the United States as a charitable nation, committed to feeding the world's poorest.

"This is good for the American farmer and producers because a lot of our food goes over seas," said Tony P. Hall, a former Democratic representative from Ohio who served as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. food agencies. The United States, he said, also "gets a lot of credit" for feeding the world's most needy. "I think people like the fact that the United States is helping."

As chief donor, the United States has also claimed a special right to appoint its own citizens to the organization's top job. If appointed, Cousin would be the fifth American to lead the world's largest humanitarian aid organization since it was founded in 1961.

She would replace Sheeran, a Bush administration nominee for the post, whose five-year term expires in April. Sheeran and Dan Glickman, a former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture during the Clinton administration, are also being considered for the job.

The WFP's executive director is formally selected by the U.N. secretary general and the executive director of the Food and Agricultural Organization, in consultation with the World Food Program's Executive Board.

But the U.N. chief traditionally has the last word, and officials said it would be uncharacteristic for Ban, who values his close relationship with the United States, to reject the Obama administration's official candidate.

The U.N.'s top food job is theoretically open to nationals from any country.

It has been held in the past by Australian, Canadian, El Salvadoran, and Dutch nationals. But it has gone only to Americans since 1992, when Catherine Bertini, who was nominated for the job by President George H. W. Bush, took over the top job at WFP.

She served a second term with the support of the Clinton administration, making her the only WFP chief who received backing of both Democratic and Republican administrations.

Bertini was succeeded by James T. Morris, a Republican nominee who served a single term, and then Sheeran. In recent months, Sheeran has sought to secure the support from the U.N. leadership for a second term.

In her annual address to WFP's Executive Board on Nov. 11, Sheeran touted her achievements at the food organization, including a policy aimed at increasing private sector contributions to the U.N. agency, and outlined her vision for its future. She announced plans to improve the internal financial controls and audit functions -- and to appoint a new monitoring and evaluation chief to improve financial oversight.

"She's determined to fight this out," said one U.N. official. "She's not acting like a person who is ready to leave at the end of the next quarter."

In her letter to Ban, Clinton made no direct reference to Sheeran, instead crediting Cousin for promoting reforms at WFP, and included a veiled swipe at the current leadership, speaking of the need for change.

She says Cousin "will bring a unique ability to inject fresh energy atop the organization as well as an intimate understanding of the World Food Program and its partners."

"The United States is deeply committed to the World Food Program and its remarkable work saving lives and protecting the livelihoods of billions around the world," Clinton wrote. "We are proud to be the organization's largest supporter, and we are confident it will thrive under Ambassador Cousin's leadership."

Clinton said the administration selected Cousin following an exhaustive interagency search. She described Cousin as "a central driver of the Obama Administration's global food security policy and its implementation, as well as a leading figure in efforts to eradicate world hunger."

Clinton said Cousin's priorities would include ensuring the food agencies "policies and programs are fully transparent" and she would "focus attention on administrative and internal management reform to promote greater accountability and operational effectiveness."

Follow me on Twitter @columlynch

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Exclusive: United Nations Food Program Suffering Hunger Pangs, Facing $1 Billion Shortfall

CLICK HERE FOR THIS STORY ON FOX NEWS


By

Published November 17, 2011

| FoxNews.com

As the global financial crisis bites deeper into the economies of wealthy Western nations, some of the biggest donors to the United NationsWorld Food Program (WFP) are coming up short, while some of the nations with the most cash in the bank -- notably Chinaand Saudi Arabia -- are still kicking in comparative peanuts.

The result: WFP faces a $1 billion shortfall in its operational budget for next year, meaning that the food crisis for the world’s hungriest people, who WFP normally says are desperate, is likely to grow worse.

Members of the WFP’s 36-nation supervisory executive board, meeting this week in Rome, were told that the agency hopes to feed 85 million people in 74 countries at a cost of about $4.82 billion -- but so far, it only has anticipated contributions of about $3.75 billion.

“Yes, this does mean that some people in need will not get the food they deserve,” a WFP spokesman told Fox News. In this case, “some” could mean quite a lot, as the shortfall amounts to about 22 percent of the hoped-for 2012 budget, or the equivalent of one person out of five among the WFP’s desperately hungry target clientele.

The belt-tightening has notably affected contributions from the U.S. and parts of Europe -- and any problem involving the U.S. is always a big problem for WFP.

America in the past has contributed as much to the food agency as the next dozen or so governmentcontributors combined. This year, the $1 billion U.S. contribution on the WFP books is about $500 million less than last year, and only as big as the next half-dozen givers.

CLICK HERE FOR FIVE YEARS OF WFP CONTRIBUTIONS

(According to USAID, Washington’s contributions to WFP will reach about $1.32 billion this year, but the U.S. government uses a different fiscal year than the U.N. agency.)

Other big donors are in the same fix. The European Commission, bureaucratic arm of the European Union, has cut its food contribution by nearly a third this year, lopping off about $100 million. Britain has tightened up even more, slicing its WFP contributions by about 40 percent, while other big spenders likeSpain, whose economy has crashed in the global debt crisis, have cut contributions virtually in half.

Moreover, countries like China, with trillions in foreign exchange reserves, are not riding to the rescue. To be sure, the Beijing regime has bumped its last-year contribution up by an impressive-sounding 500 percent -- to all of $20 million. Populous India is down on the WFP’s contribution books for $13.9 million.

One major developing country that has stepped up more solidly to the plate is Brazil. Its WFP contribution has climbed from $12.7 million in 2010 to $75 million in 2011 -- a 600 percent increase.

The oil-rich Saudis, on the other hand, are giving $54 million this year, about $15 million more than in 2010, and most other OPEC nations barely make the donor charts at all.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency, Saudi Arabia’s net oil export revenues in 2010 were $225 billion, while OPEC’s as a whole amounted to a little more than $1 trillion.

The OPEC total is expected to rise to about $1.1 trillion next year. If Saudi Arabia kept its 29 percent share of the total, that would amount to about $319 billion.

CLICK HERE FOR THE USIEA ESTIMATES

George Russell is executive editor of Fox News and can be found on Twitter@GeorgeRussell

Monday, November 14, 2011

Delay, but likely business as usual, in WFP appointment

Click here to view this at Global Memo

Some months back, I spoke with a senior contact at the World Food Program about the upcoming end of Josette Sheeran‘s first term as Executive Director of the World Food Program.

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon meets with Josette Sheeran, Executive Director of the UN World Food Programme. (UN Photo # 466405)

At the time, the Obama Administration had not yet determined if it would re-nominate Josette Sheeran, who was first nominated by President George W. Bush in 2007. Sheeran’s term is up in April 2012 and it was expected that the Obama Administration would announce whether it would support a second term before Friday’s meeting of the WFP Executive Board.

Colum Lynch at Turtle Bay reported last week that the Obama administration has decided not to re-nominate Sheeran, instead pushing the current U.S. representatives on the FAO Executive Board, Ertharin Cousin, for the post. But though the job usually goes to the American nominee, the only response to the nomination has been the sound of crickets.

Ertharin Cousin, Obama's pick for WFP Executive Director (State Dept Photo)

The actual appointment–”not an election,” I was reminded in a follow-up conversation this week–is made by the UN Secretary General and the Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organization, in consultation with the WFP Executive Board. This means that although Sheeran isn’t supported by the Obama administration, she could still be given a second term if Ban and da Silva so choose. (Also on the short list, according to officials who spoke with Lynch, is Dan Glickman, a former Democrat Congressman and current vice chair of the World Food Program USA organization.)

What “consultation with the Board” means though is entirely up to the Secretary General and Director-General. In previous years, it has taken the form of a formal discussion at a meeting of the Board. At other times, it has been calls to individual Board members. The process is extraordinarily opaque and the WFP Executive Board has little ability to affect the process or its timeline, though the Board president has made overturesin that direction this year.

The President shared with the Board a letter she intended to send to the United Nations Secretary-General concerning Board consultation in the process to appoint or reappoint the WFP Executive Director, whose new term would become effective in April 2012. The letter informed the Secretary-General of the Board’s intention to contribute to an open and transparent process for the appointment, and requested that he provide an indication on the intended timing and mode of consultation.

In the meantime, the official re-iterated that Sheeran is interested in a second term, but is keeping her head down and staying focused on the work at hand.

Lynch noted that some in the Obama administration are concerned that Ban has remained silent because he doesn’t support Cousin’s nomination. (It’s all about them, of course.) More likely though, Ban is simply including the head of the WFP among the other changes he intends to make in his cabinet early next year. I expect that a week or so before the Executive Board’s meeting in February, Ban will praise Sheeran for her service and announce Cousins as his pick. Ban is, after all, still Ban, even in a second term.


As WFP's Sheeran Claws for Reappointment, of Staff Anger, Famine and Astroturf

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, November 14 -- Alongside Italy's political chaos, the Rome-based UN World Food Program is seeing its own fight to retain power, by Executive Director Josette Sheeran whose term is expiring.

Sources tell Inner City Press that Sheeran is having senior staff lobby Member States to make statements supporting her at the just-opening WFP Executive Board. Members of Sheeran's inner circle are pushing for an Astroturf -- fake grassroots -- staff petition to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to reappoint her.

This comes on top of Sheeran appointing as WFP chief of operations with security responsibilities Ramiro Lopes da Silva, of whom after his role in the Canal Hotel bombing in Iraq Kofi Annan said could never again have security responsibilities in the UN system. Inner City Press has directly asked Sheeran (and Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson) about this, without substantive answer.

Now more WFP money is being wasted, for Sheeran's attempted re-appointment. Sheeran planned a big 50th anniversary celebration for WFP at this Executive Board meeting.

It is not really the 50th anniversary of the agency, as WFP did not start operations until 1963, but it is the anniversary of the signing of the agreement. Anyway, several officials have declined to come, or canceled -- some, sources say, not wanting to be part of Sheeran's re-election campaign.

(c) UN Photo
Sheeran gets picture from Ban, Astroturf not shown

Ban has written to Executive Board members asking for nominations for the Executive Director, though he has not excluded reappointing Sheeran in the letter. The US has already made a submission -- with, multiple sources say, more than one name.

As one Inner City Press source puts it, "the whole thing is turning into an embarrassing circus and Sheeran neglects the Horn of Africa and other crises like WFP's troubled budget to spend all her time campaigning." And so it goes in this UN.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Ban Ki-moon thinks - Obama is a first term President - he is being advised to hire Dan Glickman as replacement to Josette Sheeran

"UN's problems with money doesn't come from Obama but rather US Congress - we need a leader at WFP who would be able to persuade and work with US Congress in order to preserve the current level of funding thru out these austerity times"...a close Ban Ki-moon political advisor said.

That's why Ban Ki-moon is keeping in his desk a CV of Dan Glickman, he was:

Before his appointment as Secretary of Agriculture, Glickman served for 18 years in the U.S. House of Representatives representing the 4th Congressional District of Kansas. During that time, he was a member of the House Agriculture Committee, including six years as chairman of the subcommittee with jurisdiction over federal farm policy issues. (Bipartisan Policy Center)

This move is also seen as a slap in the face to Obama Administration who is pressing Ban Ki-moon for months to appoint at the helm of WFP Ertharin Cousin (current US Ambassador to UN Agencies in Rome). Will he choose Obama's candidate or rather chose someone who would be able to work with US Congress - we will have to watch.


This is the CV of Dan Glickman as per Bipartisan Policy Center


Dan Glickman is currently a senior fellow at the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) in Washington, D.C.

Glickman served as Chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA) from 2004 until 2010. The MPAA serves as the voice and advocate of the American motion picture, home video and television industries.

Prior to joining the MPAA, Glickman was the Director of the Institute of Politics at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government from 2002-2004. Glickman also served as a Partner and Senior Advisor to the law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in Washington, DC.

Glickman served as the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture from March 1995 until January 2001. Under his leadership, the Department administered farm and conservation programs; modernized food safety regulations; forged international trade agreements to expand U.S. markets; and improved its commitment to fairness and equality in civil rights.

Before his appointment as Secretary of Agriculture, Glickman served for 18 years in the U.S. House of Representatives representing the 4th Congressional District of Kansas. During that time, he was a member of the House Agriculture Committee, including six years as chairman of the subcommittee with jurisdiction over federal farm policy issues. Moreover, he was an active member of the House Judiciary Committee; chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; and was a leading congressional expert on general aviation policy.

Before his election to Congress in 1976, Glickman served as president of the Wichita School Board; was a partner in the law firm of Sargent, Klenda and Glickman; and worked as a trial attorney at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He received his Bachelor of Arts in history from the University of Michigan and his J.D. from The George Washington University. He is a member of the Kansas and District of Columbia Bars.

Glickman currently serves as the Executive Director of the Aspen Institute Congressional Program; on the board of directors of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange; Communities in Schools; Food Research and Action Center, a domestic anti-hunger organization; National 4-H Council; William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan; and the Center for U.S. Global Engagement, where he is Chair of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition. He co-chairs an initiative of eight Foundations, administered by the Meridian Institute, to look at long term implications of food and agricultural policy. He also chairs an initiative at the Institute of Medicine on “accelerating progress on childhood obesity.”

He is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, a senior fellow of the Center on Communication Leadership and Policy at the USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism and the Council on American Politics at The Graduate School of Political Management at The George Washington University, and is Vice-Chair of the World Food Program-USA. He also serves as a member of the External Advisory Board to CIA Director Leon Panetta. He is the co-chair of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs' global agricultural development initiative. He is the author of “Farm Futures,” in Foreign Affairs (May/June 2009).