Wednesday, July 21, 2010

WFP Installs Grain Preservation Gear

Kampala — The UN's World Food Programme (WFP) has begun installing cleaning and drying equipment in nine public warehouses. The project, which is valued at $2.4m (about sh5b), targets warehouses that use the Warehouse Receipt System (WRS).

WRS allows farmers to keep their produce in the warehouses to wait for attractive prices. The produce is valued by the warehouse managers and farmers provided with receipts worth their grain value.

Receipts can be presented to the bank as collateral security in case the farmer needs a loan before the grain is sold. The system helps farmers enjoy large economies of scale because the pooled produce boosts their bargaining power.

The WFP said it was important to find ways of keeping the stored produce without losing quality, adding that it would install the equipment at subsidised costs.

The system provides small-holder farmer groups with cleaning, drying, grading and bagging services and large and safe storage space.

"The exercise started in Gulu and is ongoing in other parts of the country" said WFP country director Stanlake Samkange.

Cleaning and drying equipment has been installed at a 6,000 metric-ton capacity warehouse in Gulu town to be commissioned in the coming months, he added.

The system will enable smallholder farmer groups in northern Uganda to benefit from the agency's grain purchases as the region seeks to recover from over 20 years of the Lord's Resistance Army insurgency.

Installations are also taking place in Tororo before moving on to Kasese, Soroti, Kapchorwa and Masindi towns.

Lango, Busoga and Buganda regions will also benefit.

"Often, small-holder farmer groups have poor quality grain, which cannot bring them a good price. This is because they lack access to modern equipment for cleaning and drying their produce," Samkange added.

Under its Purchase for Progress (P4P) programme, WFP links small-holder farmer groups to quality grain markets.

P4P involves constructing, renovating and equipping warehouses, constructing or repairing feeder roads, supporting training in post-harvest handling and value addition, and buying more food varieties in impartial ways including direct purchases and the warehouse receipt system.

The United States Agency for International Development is P4P's largest funder in Uganda. Its involvement is in line with the Obama administration's new global hunger and food security initiative.



The United States Announces Humanitarian and Post-Conflict Assistance

Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
July 19, 2010


After the bilateral Strategic Dialogue meeting in Islamabad today, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced $120 million for four programs to assist Pakistanis affected by conflict to re-establish their lives in their home areas. The United States is the leading foreign donor for displaced Pakistanis and the additional humanitarian assistance announced today further demonstrates continuing U.S. support and commitment to the people of Pakistan.
  • Malakand Housing – An estimated 23,000 housing units have been damaged or destroyed by fighting in the Federally Administered Tribal Area and Khyber-Paktunkhwa. The U.S. will provide $65 million to the Government of Pakistan’s cash transfer program to assist families whose homes have been fully or partially damaged.
  • Multi-Donor Trust Fund for the Northwest Border Region – To support local and provincial government reconstruction efforts in FATA, Khyber-Paktunkhwa, and conflict-affected parts of Balochistan, the U.S. will provide $25 million to the World Bank-administered Multi-Donor Trust Fund for the Northwest Border Region. The Fund was created following the Friends of Democratic Pakistan Summit last September. The U.S. contribution brings the total pledges or contributions to $130 million from nine countries.
  • World Food Programme (WFP) – To provide food rations for 75,000 newly displaced families or about 450,000 individual beneficiaries between August and December 2010, the U.S. will provide $20 million in additional funding to the WFP, bringing total U.S. contributions to WFP-Pakistan to just under $100 million this year.
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) – To assist the UNHCR in providing emergency shelter and non-food items, camp coordination, management and protection activities, the U.S. will provide $10 million. These supplies will help support the 1.4 million Pakistanis who remain displaced due to the on-going conflict, host families who have supported displaced Pakistanis during the course of the conflict, and the 1.95 million Pakistanis who have returned home. The new U.S. support for UNHCR will provide non-food items including tents for some 10,000 families. This new contribution will bring total U.S. support for UNHCR in Pakistan to $35 million this year.

The Economics of Food Aid in Post-Quake Haiti

Posted 8:00 AM 07/20/10
Six months on, and the statistics from the Haitian earthquake remain staggering. Consider some very basic data: Much of Haiti's capital Port-au-Prince, a city with a population comparable to Chicago, Madrid or Taipei, remains in ruins. More than 222,000 people were killed in the January quake, another 300,000 injured and about 3 million directly affected.

The U.N. estimates the quake caused $4.3 billion in physical damage and $3.5 billion in economic losses. Those last two numbers combined are more than 120% of Haiti's GDP for last year.

And don't forget that Haiti was one of the world's poorest countries even before this disaster. The U.N. Development Programme says that more than half of Haiti's 9 million-plus people get by on less than $1 a day. And the weaker global economy has reduced remittances from overseas -- which reportedly provide assistance to 70% of Haitian households.

Aid Funds Trickling In

Earlier this year, dozens of countries and international organizations pledged $5.3 billion over a two-year period to help rebuild Haiti. But according to former U.S. President Bill Clinton, co-chair of the Interim Haiti Reconstruction Commission, Haiti's government has only received about 10% of those funds so far.

International aid currently accounts for about 5% of Haiti's food requirements. The country produces less than of half the food it needs and relies heavily on commercial imports.

All these figures add up to a still dire but slowly improving situation. "Since the beginning of April we've made that transition from general food distribution to a more targeted and long-term approach," says Stephanie Tremblay with the U.N.'s World Food Programme (WFP) in Port-au-Prince, "because at some point you have to move on, you have to restart the economy."

The WFP, one of the world's largest humanitarian food aid organizations, has worked with the Haitian government and other non-governmental groups to create temporary job initiatives across the country. The program varies by region, but is meant to contribute to reconstruction efforts while bolstering Haiti's suffering agricultural sector. "Workers are typically paid with a mix of food and cash," says a WFP statement on the program. "This means that they have money to cover daily expenses such as medicines and clothing, so stimulating the local economy, but also enough food to feed their families."

WFP Food Aid List

The WFP has provided more than 104,000 tons of food to Haiti over the past six months, at a cost of $176.3 million. Here's a list of the top food items the WFP is distributing in Haiti -- and their average cost per metric ton.

High-Energy Biscuits: $1,400
Tremblay says these sustaining biscuits are more expensive because they're ready-to-eat. A six-week supply of the biscuits and other food staples have been pre-positioned around Haiti in preparation for the damaging hurricane season.

Oil and Fats: $1,200

Peas and Beans: $980
Haitians still getting assistance receive a food basket -- of rice, peas, beans, oil, fat, salt and sugar -- about every two weeks. That food basket is meant to feed a family of five. Food is also distributed to about 700,000 students at schools, where they receive a hot meal daily.

Corn/Soya Blend: $510
This blend, mixed with water, is a specialized product for children under the age of five and for pregnant and nursing women. It's used by UNICEF and other humanitarian agencies to help fight malnutrition worldwide.

Cereals -- Rice and Maize: $502

Salt: $175

One item no longer on the WFP list is the Humanitarian Daily Ration, similar to a military MRE (Meal, Ready-to-Eat). Those rations, which were widespread at the start of the crisis, cost about $8,000 a metric ton.

UN - Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General, 20 July 2010

The following is a near-verbatim transcript of today’s noon briefing by Martin Nesirky, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

Good afternoon, everybody.

**Secretary-General in Afghanistan

The Secretary-General opened the International Conference on Afghanistan in Kabul this morning, saying that the Conference marks the true beginning of a very fundamental transition. He told the Afghan people that the officials gathered in Kabul today share their aspirations and understand their frustrations. And he delivered a personal message to the Afghan people: to unite in the national interest.

The Secretary-General said that, just as Afghans are taking greater responsibility for governance and development, so must they take greater responsibility for security, as well. Improving security for Afghans is not just a matter of physical protection, he added. It also requires accountability for serious violations of human rights — those happening now and those that took place in the past.

At the end of the day, the Secretary-General gave the Conference’s closing remarks, saying that never before have we had a more concrete vision of Afghanistan’s future. Now we must focus all our energies on making this vision a reality. We have his remarks in my office.

**Security Council

B. Lynn Pascoe, the Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, briefed the Security Council this morning on the Secretary-General’s recent report on Eritrea and its dispute with Djibouti. He said that those two States had decided to resolve their border conflict through a negotiated settlement, in an agreement they signed last month in Qatar. Since then, he said, the Prime Minister of Qatar reported that Eritrean troops have withdrawn from the areas of Ras Doumeira and Doumeira Island.

Pascoe commended the recent steps taken by Eritrea and Djibouti on the border issue, and added that the Secretary-General has offered the United Nations technical support, should it be requested. We have his remarks in my office.

The Security Council followed up with consultations, including on the work of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea.

The Council President will read a press statement afterwards.

** Kyrgyzstan

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, said that she has information that security forces in southern Kyrgyzstan have been responsible for repeated human rights violations — including arbitrary detention, torture and ill treatment. She added that their actions threaten the fragile peace and re-establishment of the rule of law there.

Pillay said that large numbers of people — most of them young men, and virtually all of them Uzbek — have been arbitrarily detained in ways that not only demonstrate flagrant ethnic bias, but also break many of the fundamental tenets of both Kyrgyz and international law. The High Commissioner said her team in Kyrgyzstan had received reports of detainees being tortured or ill treated immediately upon being taken into detention, either by police, military or local militia forces.

Pillay said the current situation underscored the need for ongoing monitoring of the human rights situation, especially in the south. The High Commissioner also stressed the urgent need for a thorough international, independent and impartial investigation into the events in June.

**Democratic Republic of the Congo

The High Commissioner for Refugees, António Guterres, is visiting the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda this week to draw attention to the needs of displaced Congolese civilians.

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guterres will visit the Equateur and North Kivu provinces, where he will be joined by WFP’s [World Food Programme] Executive Director, Josette Sheeran. The two officials will then proceed to Kampala to stress the need to ensure humanitarian access to Congolese IDPs [internally displaced persons] in their meetings at this weekend’s African Union Summit.

Violence in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo has displaced some 1.85 million people internally and forced 450,000 refugees into neighbouring countries. Widespread insecurity has also blocked humanitarian access in several areas. So far this year, UNHCR says it has recorded 116 attacks against humanitarian workers.

**Niger

The World Food Programme said it is massively expanding its food aid operation in Niger to reach up to 8 million hungry people. Those include farmers who lost crops and livestock in a drought which WFP Executive Director Josette Sheeran has called an unfolding catastrophe.

Sheeran is in Niger today to assess the scale of the needs and the challenges in her agency’s efforts to boost its operations, especially those aimed at feeding vulnerable children. Although the food crisis in Niger has grown gradually worse since September 2009, WFP says it has received less than half of the USD 213 million it needs to address the crisis.

**Press Conference Tomorrow

Tomorrow, our guest at the noon briefing will be Mark Bowden, the UnitedNations Humanitarian and Resident Coordinator for Somalia. He will be here to give you an update on the situation in Somalia.

So that’s it. Questions?

**Questions and Answers

Question: Does the UN consider IHH [Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief], a charity organization in Turkey, as a terrorist organization?

Spokesperson: I don’t have any comment on that.

Question: Does it or does it not?

Spokesperson: I said I don’t have any comment on it.

Question: Are we going to get an answer on that tomorrow?

Spokesperson: Let’s see, but I don’t have any comment on it right now.

Question: On yesterday’s question regarding the workforce in the United Arab Emirates, have you got anything on that?

Spokesperson: I don’t have an answer yet. It’s being worked on, and on the other question, on Gaza, we’re working on an update both with UNRWA [United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East] and the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) to give a snapshot of where things are. But I don’t have it right now, but it is being worked on. And ditto, the other question you had asked.

Question: I wanted to ask about Sudan and [Vijay] Nambiar, versus [Inga-Britt] Ahlenius, on which you may have something. On Sudan, I know that the Secretary-General, when he went to Kampala, said that African leaders, or leaders in general, particularly with countries that are members of the Rome Statute, should cooperate with the ICC [International Criminal Court]. Sudan has said that [President] Omer Al-Bashir, it is his intention to travel to Chad this week. Chad is a member of the ICC. Does the Secretary-General believe that Chad should execute the arrest warrant on Omer Al-Bashir when he travels to Chad?

Spokesperson: As we’ve repeatedly said, the ICC is an independent judicial body; it is not under the UN. It’s not part of the United Nations, so the Secretary-General does not have to comment specifically on every aspect of the ICC’s work. That’s the first thing. The second thing is that he’s made clear that where there is a specific request that’s come from the Security Council for individuals to be taken into custody if they are facing charges, then that should be carried out. But it’s up to individual countries that are signatories to the [Rome Statute] of the ICC. It’s for them to decide how they act. It’s not for the Secretary-General to give instructions to individual countries.

Question: I’m sure you are aware of this controversy of the exit memo by Ms. Ahlenius and Mr. Nambiar’s response. At least as of now, Nambiar’s response to it says, makes various criticisms, but presents as a defence of the Secretary-General that he has been, among other things, on accountability, that he has strengthened whistleblower protections and held people accountable. Maybe you could describe what the strengthening of the whistleblower protections are, and state, for example, if Alan Doss, with an OIOS [Office of Internal Oversight Services] report sitting on Ban Ki-moon’s desk for a while now, was he held accountable? Was Shabaan Shabaan, with a pending case, and the court decision, I guess, is there some opportunity, seeing now Mr. Nambiar’s response to the press on these issues, to dig into them a little bit and either have them come give a briefing, or to substantiate what is said in his memo? And also to get a copy of the 50-page Ahlenius exit? Only the cover page is online.

Spokesperson: That’s presumably thanks to the journalistic endeavours of the Washington Post correspondent. There is the three-page summary there that you’ve been able to read.

Question: Nambiar’s thing is a public document, right?

Spokesperson: Mr. Nambiar’s, the Chef de Cabinet’s, document is out there, it’s also linked on the Washington Post and the foreignpolicy.com sites — as you quite rightly say, that this is the Chef de Cabinet on behalf on the Secretary-General, addressing specific points that had been raised by Colum Lynch in his researching and writing of the pieces that he did. So the response from Mr. Nambiar very specifically is geared to the questions that Mr. Lynch had raised. And as you also mentioned on accountability, there are any number of different measures that had been undertaken, not just by the Secretary-General. I think this is an important point, that this is part of a process that is constantly evolving. Accountability is something that has been there from the start, and successive Secretaries-General have sought to improve it, to strengthen it, in different ways. This Secretary-General came into office with precisely that aim, to strengthen accountability and transparency. He has been doing that; the specific examples that Mr. Nambiar has quoted speak for themselves. I will relay your request to him. He’s probably watching now and has heard it himself.

Question: More generally on this memo, this is a fairly strong assault, from a fairly senior individual who has since left the O)rganization. Does the Secretary-General believe there is any truth to this, or does he refute everything the letter suggests? It’s not just calling into question specific issues or incidents but the leadership overall.

Spokesperson: We received Ms. Ahlenius’ report on Friday, that’s when we got it, and the Secretary-General will be the first to say this Organization has a long way to go to fully implement the changes that are needed. So it’s precisely in that context that we are studying, including the Secretary-General, we are studying closely, this end–of-assignment report for the substantive elements in there, which can be looked at in a constructive way. But I’ll just say one thing overall, that every Secretary-General is clearly trying to strike a balance between being a Chief Administrative Officer — in other words responsible for the Secretariat, for the running of the Organization, that’s on the one hand, Chief Administrative Officer of the UN — but on the other really providing global leadership, and a global, visible leadership on the big questions. And he’s been doing that, including in Afghanistan today, co-chairing with President [Hamid] Karzai a major conference. This is a fast-changing world, and I think you only have to take a cursory look at this Secretary-General’s record on leadership, on the big questions, to see that he has achieved a lot and is clearly actively engaged on anything from climate change to gender empowerment, Haiti, Gaza, Afghanistan, disarmament — he has shown true leadership on these matters.

But any change that you introduce — and answering Matthew’s question on accountability and on some of those changes that were brought in — any change, of course, is difficult, particularly in an organization of this size. And change anywhere can bring with it, face, resistance. That doesn’t mean that change is not necessary. It is. And really the way the world has changed, the post-cold war world has changed, means business as usual at the UN is just not an option. You have to look forward, to push forward, to drive things forward. Business as usual would be a prescription for irrelevance, which is one of the words that Ms. Ahlenius refers to, I believe.

Question: The article mentions dozens of vacancies in top postings, for instance, the Chief of Investigations for OIOS. Is there a reason? What is the rationale behind the vacancies?

Spokesperson: The Secretary-General is concerned about these vacancies and in particular he wants to fill this Director of the Investigations Division, as quickly as possible. In fact, the post was vacant, as Mr. Nambiar makes clear in his note, which I’m sure you’ve read, [which is] linked to the both the Washington Post and foreignpolicy.com articles. The post was vacant from 2006, but the vacancy notice did not go out until 2008. That was under the jurisdiction of the Office of Internal Oversight Services. The Secretary-General wishes to fill that position very soon with a good candidate, and the same goes also for the Head of OIOS, the Under-Secretary-General position, the head of OIOS. That position needs to be filled, and will be filled quite soon.

Question: It seems like a lot of this revolves around Robert Appleton, who used to be the head of the Procurement Task Force?

Spokesperson: One fifth of it revolves around that.

Question: This isn’t the softball I’m throwing you, Martin. Is it true that Russia and Singapore have opposed Mr. Appleton being considered for any post within OIOS? And if not, could this be, is the Secretariat aware of opposition by Russia, Singapore, and other countries investigated during Mr. Appleton’s tenure?

Spokesperson: First of all, we wouldn’t necessarily be privy to any country’s preference or opposition necessarily, I’m certainly not aware of that kind of pressure being brought to bear, and what I can say is that this one case that is repeatedly referred to, and as I said takes up a large chunk of this end-of-assignment report, which is an internal management tool; a very valuable management tool is the way that one likes to look at these end-of-assignment reports, when they are put together in the right constructive fashion. But what one also has to stress is that this is not one particular individual, this is about due process, about the rules for recruitment within the Organization as a whole, not just for one division, department, one part of the Organization. This is a standard rule that applies to all appointments throughout the system, within the different departments and divisions and so on, that there are. That’s the way it is.

Question: In regards to the 21 allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse, does the UN know of action being taken to penalize the offenders?

Spokesperson: You are talking about the report from yesterday from DPKO [Department of Peacekeeping Operations]? I would refer you to them; I am sure they would have more details. As you know, the way that it works, they would have more details on this. But more generally, the way that it works is that people who have been accused of such violations – where there are such allegations — the people are repatriated to their countries, and it’s up to the national authorities in each country to investigate and to prosecute, and for any sanctions to be levied there, nationally. The UN, if you like, is finding out about this, or is tipped off, and then makes sure that the national authorities know about it, and of course, where someone is proven to be guilty, the UN would be very keen to ensure that person is then punished for the crime that has been committed, where a person’s been found guilty. But it’s of course for the UN to put these allegations to the national authorities to follow up and investigate. But it is for the national authorities to follow through. We keep an eye on it but it’s for them to follow through. In the specific cases you mention, I’d ask you to have a word with DPKO, or DFS [Department of Field Support], please.

Question: I want to ask about Sri Lanka and then the DSG [Deputy Secretary-General], unrelated. On Sri Lanka, on this Panel of Experts, I saw them yesterday in the North Lawn Building, so I wanted to nail down, does this mean that the four-month clock for them to produce the report has begun? Also I’m aware they met with Mr. [B. Lynn] Pascoe and Mr. [Nicholas Fink] Haysom. Did they meet with anyone else? They went into the DC-1 building; are they going to have offices there? What’s the staffing going to be? Is Jessica Neuwirth, in fact, going to lead the staff? What can you now say about the Panel, now that they were all three here and met yesterday?

Spokesperson: The Panel of Experts who will be advising the Secretary-General on Sri Lanka are indeed in New York. Well-spotted. They’re here for three days of initial meetings and briefings. They are meeting amongst themselves, as I believe you were privy to, and with their staff, and as you also said, they would be meeting with senior Secretariat officials. But contrary to what you are saying, the four-month clock did not start in the North Lawn Building when they were chatting. It does not start from this first series of meetings. They are constituting the Panel, pulling together the small staff team that will be working with them full-time for the duration of the work of the Panel. And no, you’re wrong on who is the Chief of Staff of the Panel of Experts. The Chief of Staff of the Panel of Experts, which is under the umbrella of OHCHR [Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights], is Richard Bennett, who until now was the Representative of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal. He also held a similar position in Afghanistan before that. You asked who else the Panel members will be meeting; well, it includes the Under-Secretaries-General for Political, Humanitarian and Legal Affairs, the Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Chef de Cabinet, and as you also already saw or guessed, the Political Director in the Office of the Secretary-General.

Just finally on the staffing, you asked about details on staffing; we don’t go into details on staff on a technical level, but as I said, it’s a small staff, they will be working full-time for the duration of the Panel, and it includes people who obviously have the appropriate experience in relation to the topic at hand.

Question: With the Nambiar memo, do these OHRM [Office of Human Resources Management] rules apply to the selection of the staff?

Spokesperson: This is under the umbrella of OHCHR.

Question: You may or may not have an answer to this. Yesterday, there was a meeting between the Deputy Secretary-General and the Foreign Minister of Rwanda, who some believe is a candidate for the UN Women post. In the event, it seemed like there was a photo-op; it was listed on our schedule. UN Photo went there and took a photo. For what it’s worth, I was then allowed to then go, asked Media Accreditation, they called, security screened me, I went upstairs and at the last moment I was told this is UN Photo only. So I’m not crying foul so much as I didn’t understand what the protocol was — when the Secretary-General does these meetings that are photographed by UN Photo, independent photographers can go as well. Is it different with the DSG and why would it be different?

Spokesperson: When it’s listed, without getting too technical, and maybe people are bored anyway, but boring people with, everybody with the details of this. It’s an important question of principle that you are raising, but the way you’ve come at it is actually through a technical route, if you like, and actually the daily programme of the Deputy Secretary-General listed it as a photo opportunity, which means UN Photo, which means the UN photographer. It doesn’t mean open house for you or for anybody else; it’s for the UN photographer, or a UN photographer. When it’s for the international media, it will be listed as such, as being open for the international media. So that is probably a slight misunderstanding and we can just try to be more specific about that.

Question: If it’s a meeting, why would the UN limit media coverage to its own media, which some see as something as some Member States do, but it’s generally not…?

Spokesperson: The UN Photo Service, if you like, is providing photos for use by everybody; the photos are available, you can find them on the website, there is an archive of photos and so on. In the vast majority of cases, that is so; there may be some exceptions where photos are taken and they are not on the website. The vast majority are out there. But the more fundamental point that you’ve raised is about the DSG’s schedule and the Secretary-General’s schedule. They have a range of appointments every day, as you well know, many of them back to back from morning ‘til night. Not everything is open, in the sense that journalists or, indeed, the UN photographer can pitch up and be there. It’s for their respective offices to decide and advise which of the different items, the different meetings on the schedule are going to be open, in the sense that they are available for journalists to cover on the spot. And then we are able to liaise with them — and when I say we, I mean our colleagues in the Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit — to make it happen. But sometimes there can be misunderstandings, and that appears to be what happened yesterday.

Question: Is there a readout, given the DSG was the one in charge of the UN yesterday, is it fair to ask what the topics at least, or the readout of the meeting with the Foreign Minister of Rwanda were?

Spokesperson: It’s always fair to ask and I will find out if there is a readout for you. All right, anything else? Okay, thank you very much.

[The Spokesperson later provided the following readout:

H. E. Louise Mushikiwabo, Foreign Minster of Rwanda, paid a brief courtesy visit on the Deputy Secretary-General on Monday 19 July 2010 at United Nations Headquarters. The Minister reiterated her country’s commitment to the Millennium Development Goals and her President’s commitment to fully carrying out his role as a Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s Group of Millennium Development Goals Advocates. The Minister also conveyed a suggestion emanating from the recent meeting in Madrid that consideration be given to holding a further such meeting in Africa of the Millennium Development Goals Advocates. The Deputy Secretary-General thanked the Minister for her country’s promotion of and work on the Millennium Development Goals. The Deputy Secretary-General and the Minister then briefly discussed the upcoming African Union Summit in Uganda, which they would both attend.]

UN's internal watchdog faces leadership vacuum

UNITED NATIONS — The leader of the agency that is supposed to root out corruption in the United Nations is stepping down Wednesday with no successor in sight, adding to fears that the U.N. is becoming less capable of policing itself.

With the departure of Inga-Britt Ahlenius, head of the Office of Internal Oversight Services for the past five years, three of the agency's four top jobs are unfilled. American and U.N. officials and watchdog groups are concerned that the U.N. is compromising its ability to prevent another scandal like the $1.8 billion bilked from the U.N.-run oil-for-food program in Iraq.

"The United States has consistently and aggressively pushed for a strong and independent Office of Internal Oversight Services to uncover fraud, waste and mismanagement at the U.N., but we are disappointed with the recent performance of its investigations division," said Patrick Ventrell, a spokesman for the U.S. Mission to the U.N.

"We have been crystal clear with the U.N. at the highest levels that the coming change in OIOS leadership must bring about a significant improvement in its performance to increase oversight and transparency throughout the organization," he told the AP, using the initials of the oversight office.

Interviews with OIOS officials and documents uncovered in Associated Press investigations portray a demoralized office whose staff lacks confidence in the management's leadership.

Despite a General Assembly resolution last December urging Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to ensure that a successor was appointed before Ahlenius' term expired, none has been named and no indication has been given of when that will happen.

Asked by AP about the prospects for replacing Ahlenius, Angela Kane, the U.N.'s undersecretary-general for management, said July 1 that "a very intensive search" is under way.

U.N. associate spokesman Farhan Haq said Wednesday in response to AP's questions that Ban "is, in fact, dealing with candidates and trying to find a replacement in a timely manner, in accordance with the General Assembly's request. We do not have an appointment to make today. But certainly, he is trying to fill that post as soon as he can."

Haq would not reveal who the candidates are or how many are being considered.

Ahlenius declined interview requests and said by e-mail she will submit her end-of-assignment report to Ban on Wednesday, her last day on the job.

Another OIOS leadership position — the directorship of its investigative division — has been vacant since 2006. That unit's investigators were told, in a document obtained by the AP, not to open cases of financial fraud or corruption involving U.N. vendors or former staff — a reversal of past policy. Separately, they were ordered not to follow up on or to quickly close out investigations already launched by the U.N. Procurement Task Force when it operated from 2006 through 2008, according to OIOS officials speaking on condition of anonymity because they said they feared reprisals.

The Procurement Task Force, set up in the wake of the oil-for-food case, was headed by Robert Appleton, a veteran former U.S. federal prosecutor who was special counsel for that inquiry. It was disbanded at the end of 2008 under pressure from some governments that protested findings of wrongdoing involving citizens or companies from their nations.

The General Assembly had directed Ban and Ahlenius to ensure that the task force's caseload and capacities were transferred to OIOS' investigation division.

But since the start of 2009, the U.N. under Ban has cut back sharply on investigations into corruption and fraud within its ranks, shelving cases involving allegations of theft or misuse of millions of dollars, an AP investigation in January showed.

Many of the Procurement Task Force's completed investigations included urgent recommendations to turn over evidence to prosecutors in the countries concerned, but Ban's office rarely did so. The U.N. has no prosecutorial powers.

Since the start of 2009, Ban's office has referred one major case outside the U.N., according to U.N. officials, diplomats and figures supplied to AP by the U.N.'s legal office. Some major reports also remain sealed from public view, for no publicly stated reasons.

Last month, when asked by the AP to respond to the allegations and detail the U.N.'s anti-corruption efforts, Ban replied only that "addressing corruption as a way of enhancing good governance — that is a very important area — the United Nations is putting emphasis on that."

However, David Walker, the former U.S. comptroller general who now chairs the U.N.'s Independent Audit Advisory Committee, told AP he fears OIOS will be relegated to "a caretaker status" under the temporary oversight of the U.N.'s legal chief, Patricia O'Brien.

"Frankly, my bigger concern now is the leadership vacuum that exists in OIOS because Ahlenius' term ends this month, and it's very unclear what the status of the search is for a successor," said Walker, whose committee advises the General Assembly on accountability issues.

"And, furthermore, the heads for the investigation division and the evaluation and inspections division are still open," Walker said. "There are recommendations that have been pending with the secretary-general's office for an extended period of time — and just no response whatsoever."

Appleton was twice unanimously selected by an independent U.N. panel to head the investigations unit, and was among the more than 70 applicants who responded to worldwide advertising for a candidate. He was Ahlenius' choice for the job, but when asked why he hasn't gotten the job, Ban's office and Kane said the list of applicants lacked diversity.

In the absence of a permanent director, the investigation division is run by an acting director, Michael Dudley, a career U.N. official. The department's management under his tenure was criticized by some employees of the 70-strong division in a survey of staff in late 2008 obtained by AP.

Of 52 respondents, 47 percent said the management operates with integrity and 41 percent said it doesn't. The rest had no opinion. About three-fifths described the office as having low morale, ineffective leadership and unfair promotion practices.

In a Nov. 24, 2008, e-mail to senior staff, Dudley said the survey contained "some expected comments, some of which are very personal and related to my integrity and performance." He noted "most of the negative comments about me show a lack of trust," but said he hoped to change that.

The Government Accountability Project, a Washington-based nonprofit law firm, has previously represented at least one OIOS investigator who filed a whistleblower complaint alleging retaliation by Dudley.

Bea Edwards, the firm's international program director, told the AP that Dudley "does not seem to have been able to really pursue and close the tough cases that were left there by the Procurement Task Force."

"Many serious cases of substantial corruption have simply been closed or languished in that division under his management," she said.

The AP's investigation, based on U.N. documents and interviews with officials, found that Dudley has a record of closing cases before investigations were complete and has not actively pursued the initiatives begun by the Procurement Task Force. These include plans to investigate all five of the U.N.'s economic commissions around the world.

He also has cut back on investigators experienced in financial fraud and corruption and ditched other resources including former task force investigators and a task force contract that provided expert forensic support services.

Dudley, a 47-year-old Kentuckian, was hired as a deputy director of the investigative division in 2007. He declined to be interviewed, but in response to detailed questions, he told AP by e-mail he considers every investigation to be significant. He said his division looks into allegations of fraud, bribery and embezzlement and "a wide range of matters beyond."

U.N. Insider: ‘There Is No Transparency’

BRETT D. SCHAEFER

An internal memo reveals the downward spiral of U.N. oversight and accountability.

It’s often tempting, after the latest scandal, to think that the United Nations’ reputation for shoddy oversight and lack of transparency can’t sink any lower. And yet it keeps doing so.

The latest charges of mismanagement, corruption, and fraud come from the organization’s own bureaucracy. An internal memo by Inga-Britt Ahlenius, a Swedish auditor whose non-renewable five-year term as undersecretary-general of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) ended last week, charged U.N. secretary-general Ban Ki-moon and his associates of undermining efforts to combat corruption in the organization.

This has long been obvious to observers of the U.N. Efforts to improve accountability, transparency, and oversight are often attacked from within. Many member states become angry if their citizens are fingered for corruption, and U.N. officials seem fearful that any report of problems will damage the organization’s reputation. Thus the decision to eliminate the Procurement Task Force — the only truly independent investigatory and oversight body the U.N. has ever had — in December 2008 was a frustrating but not surprising example of how effective and independent oversight is discouraged and attacked in Turtle Bay.

This also explains why scandals keep occurring. A few notable ones include:

the Iraqi Oil-for-Food scandal that Saddam Hussein used to generate some $10 billion in illegal revenue, according to the U.S.Government Accountability Office;

a huge corruption scandal in which more than 40 percent of U.N. procurement for peacekeeping was revealed to be tainted by fraud, leading to three U.N. officials’ being charged in American courts;

widespread incidents of sexual exploitation and abuse by U.N. personnel in Bosnia, Burundi, Cambodia, Congo, Guinea, Haiti, Ivory Coast, Kosovo, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Sudan.

Only rarely, however, are the efforts of those seeking to impede U.N. oversight reported by the media or otherwise brought to light. But now, we have first-person testimony from a U.N. official about just how effective the efforts to hamstring U.N. oversight have been. Among the harsh assessments relayed by Ahlenius to Ban in the summary of her end-of-assignment report, according to Foreign Policy’s Turtle Bay blog, is this:

There is no transparency, there is lack of accountability. Rather than supporting the internal oversight which is the sign of strong leadership and good governance, you have strived to control it which is to undermine its position. I do not see any signs of reform in the Organization.

I regret to say that the [U.N.] Secretariat now is in a process of decay. It is not only falling apart into silos — the secretariat is drifting, to use the words of one of my senior colleagues. It is drifting into irrelevance.

Additional comments attributed to Ahlenius in the Foreign Policypost placed the blame squarely on Secretary-General Ban:

Your actions are not only deplorable, but seriously reprehensible. No UN Secretary-General before you has questioned the authority delegated to the [undersecretary-general of OIOS] to appoint the staff in OIOS. Your action is without precedent and in my opinion seriously embarrassing for yourself.

Ban’s defense, offered by his chef de cabinet Vijay Nambiar, essentially denies responsibility, changes the subject, and questions Ahlenius’s version of events. A choice quote:

This secretary-general, like his recent predecessors, has had to strike a balance between acting as a chief administrative officer of the United Nations on the one hand, and providing truly global leadership on the other. A look at his record shows that Secretary-General Ban has provided genuine visionary leadership on important issues from climate change to development to women’s empowerment. He has promoted the cause of gender balance in general as well within the organization. He has led from the front on important political issues from Gaza to Haiti to Sudan. And today, he is in Afghanistan.

Well, as long as the gender balance in the U.N. is being addressed, the secretary-general must be doing his job, right?

Outgoing comptroller accuses Ban Ki-moon of thwarting war on corruption at UN

In a 50-page document, the official responsible for fighting corruption in the organization levied unprecedented accusations at Ban Ki-moon for undermining her efforts.

By Shlomo ShamirTags: United Nations

A Swedish diplomat who recently quit her post as Undersecretary-General and Comptroller of the United Nations has launched accusations unprecedented in their severity against Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in a memorandum that was leaked on Tuesday to the Washington Post.

The 50-page memo, which was circulated to only 9 persons, was authored by Inga Britt-Ahlenius, who recently completed her five-year term at the United Nations.

Britt-Ahlenius, a well-known figure in the hallways of the United Nations building, wrote in the memo that the secretary-general – who is currently in Kabul for an international conference about the future of Afghanistan – "undermined and sabotaged the responsibilities and independence that were granted to her office" as the senior official responsible for the war on corruption in the organization.

"Your action is without precedent," wrote the former comptroller, "Your actions are… reprehensible…and in my opinion seriously embarrassing for yourself."

The senior diplomat did not restrict herself to politically correct language in her complaints against Ban: "I regret to say that the [UN] Secretariat now is in a process of decay. It is not only falling apart.… It is drifting into irrelevance."

Britt-Ahlenius continued, "There is lack of transparency, there is lack of accountability. Rather than supporting the internal oversight which is the sign of strong leadership and good governance, you have strived to control it which is to undermine its position."

Ever since the secretariat of the organization was blamed for the financial scandal surrounding the Oil for Food program, which was revealed a decade ago and was the reason that the previous Secretary-General Kofi Annan did not pursue a second term, there have not been such serious accusations against the secretary-general of the organization, the likes of which appear in the memorandum that was leaked Tuesday.

The memo is especially embarrassing for Ban, who took office in 2007 as someone who would "clean house" and improve the image of the organization, which was seriously harmed in the wake of the revelations of the extent of the corruption that occurred as part of the Oil for Food program.

Behind the scenes and in private conversations, the current secretary-general is the target of much criticism by senior diplomats and veteran commentators. Ban, who previously served as the foreign minister of his native country South Korea, is accused of having surrounded himself with advisers who don't dare contradict him.

Ban also made a number of blunders with world powers, and it is widely known that many in the UN are unsatisfied with his work habits and with his responses to regional crises.

The Washington Post, however, also quoted senior officials in the UN Secretariat who stated that the accusations put forth by Britt-Ahlenius are not balanced and that her criticism is unfair.